Editorial Roundup: Missouri

[Tulsa World] Editorial Roundup: Missouri

Kansas City Star. November 5, 2022.

Editorial: Missouri and Kansas kids’ test scores dipped. That’s no reason to attack public schools

A recent report from the National Assessment of Educational Progress shows a major dip in math and reading test scores, including in Kansas and Missouri, for fourth and eighth grade students.

It’s time to panic.

By that, we mean a good panic: We must focus urgently on understanding the reasons for the decline, including school closures during the COVID-19 pandemic. We must then quickly repair the learning gap, including extra study, remedial classes if necessary, tutoring, perhaps renewed attention to math and reading skills.

What we must avoid is a bad panic. The dip in test scores is not a reason to toss aside public education, which remains one of this nation’s greatest and most important inventions. A guaranteed free public education provides all American children with an opportunity to learn, to succeed — and to understand, and engage with, government.

The nation’s founders, surrounded by a haphazard system of private schooling, understood this. “Preach, my dear Sir, a crusade against ignorance; establish and improve the law for educating the common people,” Thomas Jefferson wrote a friend in 1786.

By the mid-1800s, the common public school movement dipped into every corner of the nation. “Education … beyond all other devices of human origin, is the great equalizer of the conditions of men, the balance-wheel of the social machinery,” common school pioneer Horace Mann wrote.

Public schools are embedded in the constitutions in Missouri and Kansas. “The General Assembly shall establish and maintain free public schools,” Missouri’s document says.

In Kansas, “the Legislature shall provide for intellectual, educational, vocational and scientific improvement by establishing and maintaining public schools.”

“Public schools remain one of our most powerful institutions for maintaining a democratic society and fostering common understanding among our people,” National Education Association President Becky Pringle said last year.

America has the tools to protect public education, at the local school board, the local school building, the local classroom. We should use those tools. The endless, repetitive focus by a tiny minority on culture wars in the classroom is deeply harmful, and a major distraction. It must end.

Teachers must teach, so students can learn.


Make no mistake: The decline in test scores is real. Kansas fourth graders scored 235 points on the standardized math test, down from 239.5 points in 2019 (on a 0-500 scale). Missouri’s fourth grade math results dropped too, from 238.4 in 2019 to 232.4.

Eighth graders’ math scores slumped in both states.

Yet the drops are roughly consistent with the declines nationally, despite widely disparate COVID-19 policies among states. Equally important, the nation’s scores in most cases are still higher in 2022 than they were in 1992, when the NAEP program was first developed.

In fact, many experts now think the 2022 test score drop is part of a decadelong pattern, exacerbated by the pandemic but not totally caused by it. “From the late 1990s through the early 2000s, there was a decade of educational progress,” Harvard education professor Andrew Ho told The Harvard Gazette.

“Then from the late 2000s through the 2010s, there was, on average, an apparent leveling off of that trend,” he said.

It’s a small comfort, of course, to know test scores were lower 30 years ago than they are today. Kids are in school now, and they need to learn now, or face a lifetime of potential struggle.

That’s particularly true in the current environment, when new technologies swirl around students on a daily basis. It is no longer good enough to merely keep up — to stand still is to fall behind, perhaps forever.

But it is helpful to know test scores can be lifted again, as they were in late 1990s, through the concerted efforts of school boards, students, teachers and parents. That could mean extending the school year, which is still built around the 19th century agricultural model. It could mean extra classes, or catch-up study.

Improved testing that wrests less control of the curriculum away from teachers. More parental attention. The way students are taught reading may need review.

It will almost certainly mean paying quality teachers more.


There is money available. According to Department of Education figures, Kansas was awarded $831 million in American Rescue Plan school funds. Through August, almost 98% of those funds remain unspent. Missouri has spent just 20% of its ARP grant of nearly $2 billion.

Missouri has received more than $3 billion in pandemic-related education funding from Washington. It has spent less than half that money.

Governors in both states, and legislators, must begin now to develop a plan to help students recover from the recent slump. They must spend the money it takes to bring scores up, including retention bonuses and raises for poorly-paid educators.

What they cannot do is use the crisis as an excuse to further damage public education, either through misspending, ill-conceived private school voucher programs, or by getting distracted by hot-button issues in the culture wars, such as transgender youth athletes, book banning and curricular concerns about nonexistent lessons on so-called “critical race theory.”

While adults argue endlessly over books in the library, our kids are forgetting how to read, or add two numbers. It’s a generation-bending mistake.

We can and should discuss the wisdom of the COVID-19 school closings, and the success or failures of remote digital learning. That discussion should be based on facts, not conjecture. We need to be ready for the next pandemic.

But the discussion should be part of a larger conversation about what we must do to help students today. That means a focus on quality public education, not blowing it up because test scores have dipped.

A free public education is our greatest gift to our children. If it stumbles, we must work to make it better. We should not abandon it — or them — until that work is done.

St. Louis Post-Dispatch. November 3, 2022.

Editorial: The student-debt crisis is better understood as a tuition crisis

The debate over the Biden administration’s college loan relief plan has obscured a broader and more important issue: Why has college education become so expensive to begin with? It’s a complicated question that has many answers, but it’s one that anyone interested in real college-debt reform should be asking.

Biden’s plan to forgive between $10,000 and $20,000 per student in federally backed college loan debt is currently stalled in court — and isn’t doing so well in the court of public opinion. Polling shows support for the plan predictably split along partisan lines, but with low support from independents. Overall, a plurality of Americans support it, but not a majority.

As we have noted before, there are reasons for even liberals and progressives to have reservations about this plan: Its $125,000 income ceiling loops in a lot of people who don’t need relief. Offering relief to current debt-holders is unfair to those who have already paid off their debts, or who will acquire them in the future. And it’s inflationary to effectively pump hundreds of billions of federal dollars into the economy.

But the biggest problem with Biden’s plan is that it fails to address the underlying causes of skyrocketing tuition, which is ultimately the cause of the debt crisis. The net cost of a four-year degree — after applying financial aid and other price breaks — is twice what it was 20 years ago. Only hospital care has risen at a faster rate.

No wonder average student loan debt has ballooned from about $17,000 per graduate in 2000 to almost $40,000 now. Total outstanding debt today tops $1.7 trillion.

Experts point to a range of reasons for out-of-control tuition: There is the explosion of high-cost student amenities (state-of-the-art recreational facilities and the like) that have become major selling points as universities compete for students. There are bloated administrative costs, which have risen even as spending on professors and instructors has dropped. And perhaps most disturbingly, there’s the abdication by state governments of their funding responsibilities for higher education, forcing universities to push more of the cost onto students.

Data from the National Science Foundation shows that state spending per student has remained flat or even dropped (when adjusted for inflation) over the past 20 years, even as education has become more expensive. Missouri, for example, spent on average about $6,200 per student in university funding in 2020, compared to almost $8,000 (inflation adjusted) in 2000.

The student-loan debt crisis is ultimately better understood as a tuition-hike crisis — one that could threaten to return society to the days when higher education was solely the purview of the wealthy. Debt is the symptom. Trying to alleviate it without addressing the root causes of the disease isn’t the answer.


Copyright 2022 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.
Source: Tulsa World